3 minutes reading time (611 words)

Industrial Engineers, Real or Imaginary?

Industrial Engineers, Real or Imaginary?

When I was in High School and I had to decide what I wanted to be when I grew up, I went to the library and looked at all the career books I could find.  This was a decision I was going to get right. 

I wanted to make sure I found a job where I would enjoy the work I did vs. just collecting a paycheck.  As I explored the limitless options, I came upon Engineering.  Now that’s something that had a nice “feel” to it.  I could use math and science to create things and help people. 

As I dug further, I quickly realized that there was no such career as Engineer.  I had to choose a specialty.  Even within the field of Engineering there were dozens of options.  I found Electrical, Mechanical, Civil, Chemical, Network, Biomedical and a few others I did not fully grasp. 

As I weighed out the Pros and Cons and matched them to my skill set, I realized that as a guy who could barely change his oil, I should avoid about half of these.  Then I stumbled along Industrial Engineering.  I learned that it was less about working on machines and things, but more geared towards the human factors.  The general premise is that while all the machines are nice, it is the human that is the most important part of the equation.  The idea that you could take the same environment, and customize it to the human to increase comfort and efficiency really spoke to me.  It was official.  I wanted to be an Industrial Engineer when I grew up!

While in college, I began to get the impression that there was a pecking order among Engineers.  Industrial Engineers had a curriculum that required less conceptual math and science like Calculus IV and Quantum Physics.  Instead IEs studied Business Calculus and Statistics/Probability and human sciences like Biology and Psychology.  This gained us the perception that we were less of an Engineer.  This, accompanied by the fact that the other engineers were supposed to design something and we were adapting their designs for the human, earned us a lesser role in the Engineer community.  Somewhere along the line we became branded as Imaginary Engineers vs Industrial Engineers.

I took offense to that for the first 10 years of my career.  Then after stripping out the emotion, it became a simple math problem.  We either add real value or we do not.  There is nothing imaginary about that.  Since then I have been able to really embrace the benefits of my profession. 

IEs are more than just the person walking around with a stopwatch.  Time studies are a small part of what we do.  (Although I believe industry is getting away from the traditional timestudy in favor of more glamorous philosophies like Lean, 6 Sigma, etc…) 

IEs add value by costing jobs based on what the process is capable of using methods that are proven vs. the old trial and error method.  They play key roles in increasing effectiveness by engaging the work force and putting them in a position to be more successful.  This is accomplished through: Work Place Layout, Work Station Design, Staffing Modeling, Capacity Modeling, and Process Improvement teams to reduce/eliminate the bottleneck.  As well, Creating/Leading Process Improvement Systems, and Managing Capital Projects. 

After experiencing all of these both first hand and as an observer of my other IE colleagues, I am convinced that Industrial Engineers provide real value to industry and that the benefits are real, not imaginary.

 

Scott Moore is the Founder and Managing Partner of Moore Industrial Engineering and a Founding Member of the One Food Team.

Training for the FSMA proposed rule on intentional...
10 Ways to Choose a Food Defense Consultant
 

Comments 1

Already Registered? Login Here
Scott Moore (website) on Thursday, 27 February 2014 05:05

Have other Ind. Engineers had similar experiences?

0
Have other Ind. Engineers had similar experiences?

Most Popular Blogs

The proposed FSMA rule for intentional contamination uses the phrase "a person knowledgeable about food defense" in several places. What it doesn't tell you is how to choose a consultant (internal or ...
17216 Hits
Missing from the proposed FSMA (Food Safety Modernization Act) rule on intentional contamination is any requirement for "broad mitigation strategies."  In this article we will explore the implica...
16832 Hits
The FSMA proposed rule on intentional contamination provides two ways to determine what are called "actionable process steps."  This is a facility and process-specific "point, step or procedure" ...
16628 Hits
In Part 1 of this blog we discussed the first of two approaches for determining "actionable process steps."  This is a facility-specific "point, step, or procedure" in a food process where there ...
15647 Hits
People that have been working with Food Defense will notice some things that they have previously focused on that are missing from the proposed rule for intentional contamination. In this post we will...
15243 Hits